Political arithmetics
According to Francis Fukuyama's inane "End of history" thesis, all societies "naturally" tend to democracy. He also claims that democracies don't fight each other.
According to the "liberators" of Iraq this country is now a "democracy". According to evil bureaucrats of the EU Turkey is a democracy as well, and suited to join the EU bureaucrat mafia.
After the US backed invasion of Turkish troops in Northern Iraq this leads to a variety of possibilities.
Option 1: Iraq is no democracy.
Option 2: Turkey is no democracy.
Option 3: Fukuyama and heaps of other neoconservative political analysts are a bunch of imbeciles.
Option 4: Fukuyama and heaps of other neoconservative political analysts are a bunch of blatant liars.
In my humble point of view all of the above hold true.
Conclusion: Representative governments are just tyrannies in disguise. Working actively against governments is no terrorism, but mere self defense. Governmental "anti terror activities" just abolish the few democratic achievements that made wage slavery acceptable. In a time, when it's possible to have millions voting for their American or Australian or whatever Idol, it's a piece of cake to have referendums for any crucial decision, instead of bipartisan collusion to privatize governmental duties.
Any politician who insists that direct democracy is impossible is an active enemy of democracy, and should be reeducated in facilities like Guantanamo Bay or Christmas Island. The global society can no longer afford to feed parasites called politicians. Governments are no necessity, but a disease of society.
Resources wasted for warfare could feed everyone on this planet, and even allow everyone a happy, healthy and wealthy life. The only obstacle to this are governments and psychopathic judicial persons (also known as corporations). Stop enjoying your chains.
3 comments:
hey, do you reckon fukuyama's sounds kinda like "fuck your mama"?
or am i the only one who notices that?
just sayin' is all.
also:
Finally, a word on “democracy”.
I take my cues on American democratic theory from Pat Robertson’s “Moral Majority”, whose unwavering support of the need for the existence of Israel to usher in their dream of an apocalyptic nightmare future prompted White House spokesman (Note: he is a disinterested observer) Ari Fleischer to remind us that “Ariel Sharon is a man of peace”.
What the Moral Majority indicates is, quite simply, they are incontrovertibly right on all things.
See, if you were right, you’d be the majority, now wouldn’t you?
This is democracy we’re fighting for, get it?
No, I won't fuck ya mama (well, maybe I would, I just don't know her). However, the phonetic proximity might well explain why he's so incredulously mental.
'Francis, fuck ur mama, Francis, fuck ur mama' (say it loud and you'll find the related nursery rhyme straight away) will possibly still bring back unpleasant childhood memories. His career serves as warning to the detrimental long term consequences of school yard bullying.
I don't know whether I'd count myself to any "moral majority" - morals are even more relative then Einstein's theories. Although I'm undoubtedly a genius in disguise, I'd rather enjoy myself than develop any ideas to make everyone happy. And I won't give up to be wrong on a daily basis - imho the only way to continue learning.
Let's get a bit semantic. Even conservative thinkers might agree that "communism" never existed, just socialism. "Democracy" is a similarly untried ideal, a better word for the failed attempts to implement it would be "democrazy".
The esperanto word demokrati still sounds very similar, but might be better suited to discuss a society that is based on mutual agreements of all affected people in a community/society, and to have a way to distinguish democrazy and demokrati. The term anarchy is unfortunately very ill-reputed and even more misconceived than democracy, and thus quite suboptimal for re-education purposes.
Post a Comment