Once you have identified with some form of negativity, you do not want to let go, and on a deeply unconscious level, you do not want positive change. It would threaten your identity as a depressed, angry or hard-done-by person. You will then ignore, deny or sabotage the positive in your life. This is a common phenomenon. It is also insane.

Negativity is totally unnatural. It is a psychic pollutant, and there is a deep link between the poisoning and destruction of nature and the vast negativity that has accumulated in the collective human psyche. No other life forms on the planet knows negativity, only humans, just as no other life form violates and poisons the Earth that sustains it.

Climate change or consciousness change?

I freely admit that maybe I spend too much time writing about Climate Change, reflecting the popularity of this fear-meme and reacting to the overload of propaganda in all forms of media. The chemtrails season has restarted, another obvious reminder that no matter how much I would rather not interact with this meme and its manifestations, it affects my daily life.

Like any fear-meme it traps lots of energy in the mind to engage in a lost battle. The denier try to protect themselves from paying for the other sides paranoia, the fearmongerers feed their fear even more by failing to convince the other side of 'scientific truths'.

Meanwhile, our dominators can rub their backs for another cheap trick to distract from their parasitic existence. Our species is relatively young, and most likely only for a short period infested by the meme of government. It's ability for fast meme creation and distribution contributed to its evolutionary survival. It's easy to forget our natural inheritance in man-made environments. Other forms of life are mostly pests or pets, some foods successfully disguise any origin of formally living matter.

The currently dominant evolutionary strategy, being a ruthless master of this planet, mirrors this disassociation from life. This has not only destroyed other species and ecosystems, it also contributes to an increasing level of insanity within our own species. Obesity, autism, allergies, death by suicide, death by violence, schizophrenia, fear-related disabilities blossom in the 21st century.

So if mankind acted as one organism, interested in general health of it whole self, what challenge would need tackling first? Global warming?

Mankind has experienced some different climates in its about 200,000 years presence on this planet. Our adaptability created colourful varieties of how to live together in all sorts of environments, from tropical forests via scorching deserts and moderate climates to arctic regions. As traveller we might experience this amazing fact for ourselves, yet we might realise at the same time our own inability to survive under conditions which differ too much from our usual habitat.

Even though our planet would change its face when some of the current horror scenarios become reality, mankind would have a fair chance to survive. Whether I could still publish a blog, or if the rising sea levels and so on would destroy human global communication infrastructure I don't know. The world game would certainly change, maybe even to the better. If enough artefacts survive the cataclystic climate catastrophe, maybe the next generations fight off governments better, and enjoy sustainability instead of manic power games.

A future with these changes would be a motive for action today. But there's much more urgent action needed, to stop wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Palestine, Chechnya, Tibet and countless other places. The amount of physical and psychological damage produced right now exceeds most likely the current capacity of worldwide healers of all kinds, the amount of teaching capacity required to resocialise politician, bankers, bureaucrats and other parasiticly feeding humans is not there yet either.

If we'd compared the evolution of mankind to the development of a human being, it would be just about the age for kindergarten. Don't be fooled by the lack of expression, the emotional game play looks just the same. The most favorite toy is oil, unfortunately it's not a harmless sand pit squabble but the end of the current human existence for millions.

The collective human body undergoes some chemo-therapy right now, and invasive surgery is next on the list. Once the cancer government is gone, healing can commence.

I can't promise that our climate won't kill us once we stop killing each other. I call it hypocritical to want to save the planet's life and do nothing to stop the useless daily deaths.

Consciousness (or just personal responsibility) are not yet part of the political and economical game that produced this crisis-meme. A carbon tax for carbon based life demonstrates the level of unconscious sanity politics suffers from.

change climate current death dominant existence game general global government human kill level life mankind matter maybe meme planet produced species stop survive

created at TagCrowd.com

Countless people in East and West throughout the ages have tried to find God, salvation, or enlightenment through denial of the body. This took the form of denial of sense pleasures and of sexuality in particular, fasting and other ascetic practices. They even inflicted pain on the body in an attempt to weaken or punish it because they regarded it as sinful. In Christianity, this is called mortification of the flesh. Others tried to escape from the body by entering trance states or seeking out-of-body experiences. Many still do. Even the Buddha is said to have practiced body denial through fasting and extreme forms of ascetism for six years, but he did not attain enlightenment until after he had given up this practice.

The fact is that no one has ever become enlightened through denying or fighting the body or through an out-of-body experience.

Viruses of the mind are not some far-off future worry like the sun burning out or the earth being hit by a comet. They are here with us now—have been with us since before recorded history—and they are evolving to become better and better at their job of infecting us. We are being infected in some new ways—television, popular music, sales techniques—but also in very ancient ways—education, religious teachings, even talking to our closest friends. Our parents unwittingly infected us when we were kids. If you have children, chances are you are spreading the viruses to them every day.

Read a newspaper? Catch a mind virus. Listen to the radio? Catch a mind virus. Hang out with your friends and shoot the breeze about nothing in particular? Catch one mind virus after another. If your life isn’t going the way you would like, you can bet mind viruses are playing a large part. Having relationship problems? Mind viruses take over parts of your brain and divert you from what would give you long-term happiness in a relationship. Having trouble in your job or career? Mind viruses cloud your future and steer you along a career path that supports their agenda, not your quality of life.

Cult religions are springing up everywhere, the result of more and more powerful mind viruses. These cults take control of people’s minds and make members engage in bizarre behavior ranging from odd rituals to mass suicide. If you think you’re immune, remember: nobody ever set out intentionally to join a cult and have their mind taken over. It’s the work of tricky and pernicious mind viruses. And once the founder of the cult starts the process, the virus of the mind takes on a life of its own.

... if your destination, or the steps you are going to take in the future, take up so much of your attention that they become more important to you than the step you are taking now, then you completely miss the journey's inner purpose, which has nothing to do where you are going or what you are doing, but everything to do with how. It has nothing to do with future but everything to do with the quality of your consciousness in this moment.

Authentic spiritual teachings are teachings from direct experience devoid of prejudice, provincialism, or predilection. That is based on eternal living tradition motivated and animated by a living truth. Compare that to dead teachings, rote memorization, conformity, and mechanical obedience to external authoritative systems and one can easily understand human history and its discontents. The champions of institutionalized tradition only create prisons and traps, because their own egos and and prideful identities live in a mental prison. They become jealous and scornful of those who have escaped.

This remark holds good, whether we believe that the various qualities of the voice originated in speaking under the excitement of strong feelings, and that these qualities have subsequently been transferred to vocal music; or whether we believe, as I maintain, that the habit of uttering musical sounds was first developed, as a means of courtship, in the early progenitors of man, and thus became associated with the strongest emotions of which they were capable,—namely, ardent love, rivalry and triumph. That animals utter musical notes is familiar to every one, as we may daily hear in the singing of birds. It is a more remarkable fact that an ape, one of the Gibbons, produces an exact octave of musical sounds, ascending and descending the scale by halftones; so that this monkey "alone of brute mammals may be said to sing." From this fact, and from the analogy of other animals, I have been led to infer that the progenitors of man probably uttered musical tones, before they had acquired the power of articulate speech; and that consequently, when the voice is used under any strong emotion, it tends to assume, through the principle of association, a musical character. We can plainly perceive, with some of the lower animals, that the males employ their voices to please the females, and that they themselves take pleasure in their own vocal utterances; but why particular sounds are uttered, and why these give pleasure cannot at present be explained.

Worst Journalist ever

The name George Monbiot sounded familiar to me, and I might have read some of his columns in The Guardian before. Maybe journos of the writing profession don't need any interview skills, or they are not used to TV interviews. However, if Mr. Monbiot represents a well acclaimed journo I'm more than happy that I trashed my idea of a degree in Media.

The self-confessed 'evangelical atheist' has embarked on a crusade against 'climate skeptics', and was given the chance to debate one in person. His believe system could not cope with disagreement, and his assumptions about the world around him sounded amazingly naive.

'Science has to be be open and tranparent'. Now that's interesting. I have to pay to see scientific papers, and any paper touching anything that's potentially related to 'national security' is most likely out of bounds. Most security, however, lies in the obscurity embedded in academic language, which makes most 'scientific findings' incomprehensive. No, Mr. Monbiot, that's lousy preparation, on a global scale, most officially done scientific research is neither open nor transparent. As evangelical atheist you might believe that scientists generate the truth religions don't want to admit, but sorry, that's just your personal believe.

The next faux pas happened when Mr. Monbiot talked about 'unequivocal opinion' of the scientific community, something fairly unfamiliar in scientific history. Science has some amazing theories on offer, which still haven't pervaded the mainstream myth about reality. According to physics, matter is highly elusive, and composes only a minor fraction of our perceivable universe. Einstein's relativity theory is hard to swallow in its original language, but translates easily into Hopi language.

Omg, I did the Alex Jones disgression. Not too surprising, considering how the interview played out. The 'climate skeptic' (professor sound-and-so, he didn't have much time to talk over the restless interruptions of an overeager evangelist) mentioned that the scare about climate change was basically a scam to feed bureaucracy without another scheme to collect taxes.

Of course, this had to be immediately classified as conspiracy by Mr. Monbiot. The myth about the impractibility of conspiracies, reiterated by a smirking journo, didn't enhance his performance or the flow of the debate. Kudos for Terry Jones, who stayed pleasantly neutral and called Mr. Monbiot to order several times.

Unless I assume that scientists find nothing but the 'truth', I wonder about the background of things like the Copenhagen conference. I think it's quite retarded to assume that the cause of the created climate crisis can be the cure as well. So if I go with the idea that the CO2 balance as main culprit for global warming, especially the surplus coming from burning fossile fuels, than it's out of the hands of government anyway. Energy companies have a higher annual budget than most governments, and most governments released corporations from any social obligations.

Witnessing the permanent attacks on nature made with imbecile excuses here in Australia doesn't give me any trust that the 'elected leaders' in this country give a damn about this planet. Having lived in other places convinces me that this is rather typical, and it doesn't even surprise me. Their actions create sufficient individual wealth for them and their offspring, and their influence on the 'lead' societies is rather symbolical.

Our spaceship Earth has too many captains, and only violence keeps most of them in power. The transition from the industrial to the information age seems so superfluously brutal. Obedience trumps empathy, rules relieve from responsibility. Gaia seems to have a little fever. I wonder if she would suggest carbon trading to cool her down, or if a bit respect and less rape could help.

'climate assume atheist believe climate conspiracy create debate give global governments interview language monbiot mr open paper person scientific seems sounded surprise talk

created at TagCrowd.com

Merry Kill-mas

The world has changed on 9 11 -
it has turned into a fascist heaven.

Soon, the coalition of the willing
started their useless killing
with an incredible haste
to dispose their nuclear waste.

Life has gotten so much rougher
with generations bound to suffer
while the spy agencies dragnet
extends to the whole planet.

Reason has lost its place
as motivator for our race
it all went terribly wrong
since only fear moves us along.

War is just temporary insanity
and will not last until infinity,
yet blind trust in war government
prolongs this cruel predicament.

Human rights no longer count,
the prison industry profits abound.
You have to be real brave
not to become the state's slave.

The prize of freedom is vigilance,
but it's less sexy than ignorance.
Lulled into a virtual reality
individuals enjoy lots of cruelty.

Fascists are in power again,
and it drives me insane -
yet it solved a personal mystery,
whether we're doomed to repeat history.

O, how much I'd love to hear
people speaking up without fear.

When we frame the inquiry "how did human languages originate?" in terms not of adaption but of living bodies, we are necessarily confronted with the creation of meaning, a creation that did not arise de nove but was grounded in an already present semantic repertoire, itself grounded in archetypal corporeal-kinetic forms and relations that, as suggested, follow along biological family lines. Accordingly, we should take not only gestural systems of communication seriously: we should take movement seriously, all the more so in view of the fact that in the bisocation of modalities, the kinetic modality is always primary: it is the source of meaning.

Global Whining

Our planet offers an amazing abundance, basis for all sort of life. All these life forms have co-evolved with their Umwelt, the climate being part of this Umwelt. Simply being alive means altering the enviroment, transforming food into energy for movement and into various metabolic byproducts.

The abundance of life-sustaining 'stuff' becomes fairly obvious when one considers the amount of energy currently used to propagate a global scare campaign about the climate. It's quite amazing to see how much pollution is created to squabble about global warming. If someone believes strongly that Co2 is the culprit for seemingly catastrophic climatic changes, why don't they use modern technology like video conferencing instead of physically traveling around, creating masses of Co2 in the process?

Which logic dictates that it's okay to destroy old growth forests, which are nature's carbon dioxide traps, when 'climate change' is of such importance? But logic and reason, so it seems, are not part of any proposed solution to the perceived problem.

Rhetorics dictate the media discourse, the old meme 'us vs them' makes 'climate change deniers' to Holocaust deniers, all the while none of the participants of official talks shows any sign of personal responsibility. Politicos claim scientists have found the truth, citizens trust into their politicos, especially if those don't follow their own opinion, but those of impeccable and infallible scientists.

That's right. In any given time of history, scientific knowledge was incomplete, and most assumptions and conclusions wrongly oversimplified. But now, in the 21st century, thanks brilliant fundamentalists like Dawkins, that has changed. Scientists stopped to err, like the Oracle of Delphi they cannot but tell the 'truth'. In earlier times of history saints channeled divine truth to their communities, now scientists are blessed with this job. Hurray, finally I can stop to think for myself, I just find a scientist to answer all my questions.

One of the factors that taints the credibility of contemporary science is the idea of causation. Let's take a simple example, a man stabbed with a knife in his heart. Obviously, the knife caused the death of the man, but it's not weapons, but people that kill people, so the 'cause of death' is the stabber. The 'stabber', however, is not primarily a cause of death, any investigator would look for a motive.

Neither the knife, nor the stabber, nor the combination of knife and stabber suffices as 'cause' for death. The amount of detail about the circumstances of that killing event is theoretically limitless, a judge would certainly require lots more than I made up on the spot to determine whether the deed will be penalised as murder, as man slaughter or as act of self-defense.

Any credible scientist will avoid stating any definite causal chain, as our planetary climate is a highly complex system. System theory as a discipline of science is less than a century old. Chaos theory, an offspring of system theory, became popular during the 1980s, and most definetely deserves consideration when attempting to make predictions about the climate. A 'young' science like that is highly prone to be wrong, new territory needs time for exploration before usable pathways are found.

Mankind is part of the 'finite' system planet Earth, and its activities, especially the technological aspects, affect the entire system. The pollution of man made industry spread through the atmosphere around the globe, it sounds retarded to deny human influence to its environment. Many cultures in history ended in ecological desasters, the lack of understanding of the interconnectedness of nature doomed many civilisations.

If mankind would want to learn from history, than treating nature with more respect must be the consequence. Indigenous people managed to survive for centuries, until globalisation destroyed the balance of their Umwelt. Only sustainable approaches to live with the natural environment succeeded, imposing control over nature with anthrocentric approaches always ended in doom.

It sounds quite hypocritical to claim that controlling CO2 emissions will avert an almost certain catastrophe. Most contemporary species have survived for millions of years on this planet, with about 30,000 years we have just started to use our survival potential as species on this planet. The thought of us (mankind) wiping ourselves off the planet in maybe only a century is way too pessimistic for me to buy into, although I certainly believe that we have the technological capacity to exterminate all human life on this planet.

But okay, let's assume for a second that reducing Co2 in the atmosphere will safe the planet. First priority then should be the preservation of existing 'carbon sinks', which is good old rain forest, saved from activists around the planet since the 1970's, nevertheless shrinking at an alarming rate. Instead of getting hyperactive simply doing less. Less rain forest killed means less heavy machinery running on fossil fuel, less global transport of those goods, and mainly a living ecosystem binding massive amounts of Co2.

And course, reducing emissions at the same time, or at least, not increasing them. Although I'm not a friend of nuclear power, generating energy in this way certainly wouldn't contribute to more Co2. Instead of hailing Iran for its nuclear program as spearhead for non-carbon based energy production, she is demonised. Instead using Australia's sunny predisposition to become world leader in solar technology, sun-deprived Germany, smaller than Victoria, generates more solar energy than entire Australia.

O wait, there's a catch. In global fascism nobody beats its own drum, all march in step. Those hippie ideas of saving forests and green technology creates too much autonomy, and require different solutions for different areas. Once the sheeple have grazed the idea of Co2 causation, their next meager meal is a hidden tax to finance a trading scheme.

The fear mongering in the name of science is already hard to swallow, but a positive influence of trading on the climate sounds like a pretty drug-crazed idea. It's a bit like reinventing the rain-dance, just in a suit, without music, dance and others to pick up the bill. Please, my local politico-parasite, present me a scientist to prove that trading cools this planet, and until then, stop the systematic rape of nature in this country.

century climate co2 death energy forest global history idea instead kill knife life man mankind nature planet science scientists sounds system technology umwelt

created at TagCrowd.com

Darwin's wholistic conception of evolutionary continuities is never mentioned in twentieth-century Western scientific or philosophic circles. It has never been openly challenged. It has never been methodically rebutted. It has simply been ignored. By twentieth-century standards, only the Origin of Species and the second half of The Descent - Selection in Relation to Sex - count as evolutionary theory. The rest is silence ... the pressing question then is, why is there a selective reading of Darwin? Since never explictly discredited, why is his organic and evolutionary wholism not taken seriously?

The master does his job and then stops. He understands that the Universe is forever out of control and that trying to dominate events goes against the current of the flow. Because he believes in himself, he doesn't try to convince others. Because he is content with himself, he doesn't need others' approval. Because he accepts himself, the whole world accepts him.

World Gaming recognises that there are no unnatural materials. If nature permits their chemical=elements associabilities, the materials and their functions are natural. If nature does not permit or bring about their associability, they cannot exist. The substances permitted by nature might be unfamiliar to humans, but they are never unnatural - i.e., "synthetic." World Gaming notes that humans' fear of the unfamiliar often prevents realization of humanity's imminent acquisition of improved living conditions for everyone.

Spiritual and/or religious methods can be tested for their biological validity by the question: Can I bring my body with me? [...] The physical body, as metaphysics states, is the substantial portion of the rest of us and not "separate". The body remains the boundary or the crucible wherein the alchemical opus of your Life Work takes place. Instruction: Bring your body with you.

We are accustomed to use our eyes only with the memory of what other people before us have thought about the object we are looking at.

If you want to stride into the Infinite, move within the Finite in all directions.

When the Russian mathematician Ouspensky, was first studying with Gurdjieff, he had great trouble understanding Gurdjieff's insistence that most people are machines and totally unaware of the objective world around them. Then, one day, after World War I had begun, Ouspensky saw a truck full of artificial legs. Thes artificial legs were being sent to the front-line hospitals, for soldiers whose legs had not even blown off, but whose legs would be blown off. The prediction that these legs would be blown off was so certain that the artificial legs were already on their way to replace the natural legs. The prediction was based on the mathematical certainty that millions of young men would march to the front, to be maimed and murdered, as mindlessly as cattle marching into a slaughterhouse.

In a flash, Ouspensky understood the mechanical nature of ordinary human consciousness.

Eye is watching you,
it's no lie, it's true!

Gang of criminals

Once upon a time, a German politician named Wolfgang Schäuble met with an arms dealer. Only once, said Schäuble when confessing his nefarious action to the German parliament. However, he managed to forget that he received 100,000 Deutschmarks in cash during this meeting.

It was a tough time for the conservative party in Germany end of the last millenium. Dodgy ways to finance the party became public, suitcases of large amounts of cash, Swiss bank accounts and other schemes looking just like money laundry were unveiled. The social-democrats had taken over the government, and the conservatives were looking for new leadership.

Angela Merkel promised to 'sort out' the internal affairs, and bring honesty back into the party. For a while, she distanced herself of the icons of this scandal and tried to establish her position as 'leader' of the conservative party.

Angela Merkel became the first female chancellor in Germany, with high hopes that a coalition of German's two major party could overcome the indecisive inertia to tackle urging problems (like in many places, education, medical welfare, pensions and employment lack structure, commitment and resources). This hopes remained unfulfilled, the militarization of everyday life dominated politics.

Now, after she won the election and got rid of coalition with the social democrats, it was time to present her chosen ministers. A dutch journalist dared to ask Angela Merkel whether someone who meets up with arms dealers and 'forgets' about 100,000 Deutschmark in cash in his desk drawer is suitable as minister of finance for 82 million Germans. "He is someone who has got my trust, that's all I have to say."

In a way, her reply is much more honest than expected. In feudalism, trust determines how power is split up. Different laws apply for those who govern and those governed. A little bit of corruption and money laundry for the party can end up in jail with laws condemning his undemocratic and subversive behaviour as criminal. The German laws about the misdeeds of political parasites 'forget' penalties. Although the way the conservative party did their financing produced a scandal and lots of public outrage, none of the perpetrators needed to take responsibility in front of a regular court.

So, technically, even though Schäuble confessed his covert meeting with an infamous arms dealer, he's not a criminal. His status as politician prevented the jail term he would have received if he had done the same thing for an officially known organized crime gang. But being part of the gang that declares other gangs as 'bad' made it easy to continue as if nothing ever happened.

The criminal energy and inventiveness he had shown earlier to finance his partys affairs might come handy in his new role as minister of finance. Being reminded in public about her choice of team players, Merkel didn't seem amused, yet to me the name Rob Savelberg appeared on the horizon of real journalists.

Thanks, Rob.

Reichians, disciples of Mr. Spock and the Summerhill school, etc. have called attention, with some impatience, to the brutality and stupidity of many of our traditional child-rearing methods.These methods are "brutal" and "stupid" only if, like the above-mentioned heretics, one regards the goal of child-rearing as the production of a sane, balanced, creative [NOT CRATED] human being. THIS HAS NEVER BEEN THE GOAL OF ANY SOCIETY IN THE REAL WORLD. The traditional child-rearing methods are quite logical, pragmatic and sound in fulfilling the real purpose of society, which is not to create an ideal person, but to create [CRATE] a semi-robot who mimics the society as closely as possible - both in its rational and irrational aspects, both as repository of the wisdom of the past and as the sum totalof all cruelties and stupidities of the past. Very simply, a totally aware, alert, awakened (unbrainwashed) person would not fit very well into any of the standard roles society offers, the damaged, robotized products of traditional child-rearing do fit into those slots.

In case I never mentioned, feel free to guess or ask about any of the quotes here.

brutal child-rearing crate create fit fulfilling goal human irrational methods mimics past person products rational real regards society standard stupid traditional unbrainwashed wisdom

created at TagCrowd.com

Peacemeal

Carving words with electronic ink into the global memepool,
synthesizing, meshing up the eclectic new old school.
Creating alternate meanings by strange association,
getting ready for another inevitable disassociation.

Attracted by distraction, distracted by attention.
Amazing inventions dilute all focused intention.
It feels so good to watch the rat race,
it feels so good to judge the rat race.

Fit in or get voted out, in tv and politics.
Both using the same deceptive tricks,
just to keep a Matrix alive,
where only strong survive.

The wheels spin on, big and small.
A single moment captures it all.

Torturing for peace

Barak Obama, president of the once glorious United States of America, has been awarded with the Nobel prize for Peace. The magic negro strikes again. A Republican commented that Obama got this prize for his 'awesomeness', and, besides any more sinister explanations, this seems like the main motivation.

So what has Obama done (besides being awesome, especially as a speaker) to deserve this honour? Nothing. What has he done to make this peace prize one of cruelest farces of the 21st century? Heaps.

The US continues to have military bases in nearly 100 foreign countries (no blame for Obama here, just establish the warlord status). The US has invaded two countries in the 21st contury (no blame here either for Obama), and continues to occupy them, and has no plan to pay reparations for the damages done to these countries. O, I nearly forgot about the covert war in Pakistan... The Bush administration systematically used torture and deployed legislation with a spirit that predates the Dark Middle Ages, and Obama continues to run torture camps like Guantanamo Bay, Bagram and Abu Ghraib.

So what makes someone who talks about change but continues a system of injustice, war and violence worthy of receiving the Nobel Prize for Peace? That he didn't 'officially' invade another country in his first year as POTUS, although the US foreign policy of this millenium has killed and displaced millions of people, but that he kept the US invasion in northern Pakistan under cover? That he kept the peace with the global banking crooks by paying billions of dollar as bailout ransom?

It's kind of cynical that the most belligerent part of nations (the 'western' cultures) nominate a 'peace' prize. Violence has replaced diplomacy, reason vanished
from international politics, paranoid angst dominates. At least the lies that led to the invasion of Iraq are in the public domain now, yet this has not changed anything about the attitude towards the bizarre status quo.

I got it now. Obma deserves the peace prize because he brings peace of mind. When I close my eyes and listen to his reassuring, dynamic, charismatic voice, and just believe what I hear, beautiful images emerges. The cries of pain, desperation, humiliation of tortured souls in US prison camps get muted, the blood soaked soil fertilized a colourful field of wild flowers, the bomb aatacks, fighter strikes and skirmishes become part of a Bruce Willis movie, without a screen to be even recognised, the stench of carbit, blood and rotten flesh transforms into the joyous smell of freedom and democracy. That's it. Obama brought peace of mind to those who are blind to facts.

Man, I'm glad that I took some time to vent my anger about this bit of news. I mean, without thinking about it at a deeper level I could have gotten stuck with my anger, instead of discovering the evil geniality in this nomination. It's all a show, and global politics reflects the assumptions of our dominators.

Shortly after this millenium began, the US went on a global rampage to sponsor their war industry and to secure energy supplies. The ignorance towards international law and human rights wss demonstrated by creating a legislation that would have made Nazi Germany proud: Rendition, Military Commissions Act, sub-human terror suspects, torture instruction devised by higher parts of the administration.

The trouble is, history has yet to uncover the role of the US military-industrial complex as muscle for global corporatism. While the US empire reigns, only communists, islamists, conspirologists and other forms of terrorists dare to interpret world events in this way. More than million dead Iraqis, health professionals supervising torture techniques in camps banned from UN inspection, US military fighting in Pakistan are presented as inevitable byproducts. Temporary insanity.

Propaganda has reached the global stage. Countries act only as umbrella for global corporatism. International cooperation allowed for centuries, if not millenia to circumvent undesirable local conditions. Dyncorp, Halliburton, Blackwater and the likes have sponsored both sides of the political game, as long as the wars go on, their revenues continue to grow. The corporate monster identifies a target, and then gangs up on them, often led by the US or Israel. Global media ties allow to delude the population of the gang member countries (coalition of the willing, eg) with similar bullshit.

That's how the GFC happened. Each country needed their 'own' ways to pay the ransom money, and how to justify this blatant redistribution of taxes. Picture this: A skinny, heroin addicted street hooker (the economy). Her pimp (the global banking industry) gambled the money for her heroin away, Economy trembles and shakes from the withdrawal and attracts less business. Not enough for the next shot, a seemingly vicious cycle. But no pimp is a loner, and so he asks his friends (heads of national governments) for help. Can't you give me some money for dope from your taxpayers? I can't use her in that state! You're doing something for her health. That's how you can sell it to your sheeple.

With more heroin pulsing through her veins, Economy can stand on her feet again. ALthough still jittery, her skilled hands bring her regular customers (the global-in-local-in-global markets) up. The Market's cum spurts into the media, mystified by newspeak. The stimulus packet has revived the market.

O my Ganesh, another good reason for Obama's peace prize. That was his birth as magickal negro, 'solving the financial crisis'. Do torture camps and wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan really matter in comparison?

War is peace. That's our dominators attitude, and that's why warlord Obama got the Nobel prize for Peace.

although camps continues countries dominators done economy global heroin international military million money nobel obama pakistan peace politics prize torture violence war warlord

created at TagCrowd.com

Black pertains to the Outer Order, referring to the darkness of Matter, which conceals the Light. Red pertains to Mars and to the God Horus. Mars is the Planet of the Warrior and Horus is the Warrior God... you are on the Path of the Warrior-Magician.

Specialization is for insects

A fish ant. An ex prime ant. A toxic ant. An assist ant. A seal ant. A persevere ant. An elf ant. An intrigue ant. A please ant. A ramp ant. An insolve ant. A pollute ant. An ex orbit ant. An extra vague ant. An import ant. A vigil ant. A concorde ant. A leg ant. A discord ant. A save ant. A restore ant. A complain ant. A page ant. A vary ant. A dorm ant. A defy ant. An un-me ant. A figure ant. An ex folly ant. A serve ant. A labor ant. A war ant. A surveill ant. A resist ant. An in accord ant. A supply ant. An olive ant. A relax ant. A rely ant. A mute ant. An observe ant. An inform ant. A true ant.

The two main discoveries [...]:
First, that there is a kind of bodily awareness that profoundly influences our lives and that can help us reach personal goals. So little attention has been paid to this mode of awareness that there are no ready-made words to describe it, and I have to coin my own term: felt sense.
And second, that a felt sense will shift if you approach it in the right way. It will change even as make contact to it. When your felt sense of a situation changes, you change, and, therefore, so does your life.

Universal human rights

Mensch has the right to life by her/his own law.
Mensch has the right to life in the way sHe wills to do.
Mensch has the right to dress as sHe wills to do.
Mensch has the right to dwell where sHe wills to dwell.
Mensch has the right to move as sHe will on the face of this Earth.
Mensch has the right to eat what sHe will.
Mensch has the right to drink what sHe will.
Mensch has the right to think what sHe will.
Mensch has the right to speak as sHe will.
Mensch has the right to mould as sHe will.
Mensch has the right to carve as sHe will.
Mensch has the right to work as sHe will.
Mensch has the right to rest as sHe will.
Mensch has the right to love as sHe will, where, when and with whom he will.
Mensch has the right to die how and when sHe will.
Mensch has the right to kill those who would thwart these rights.

Global warming has hit the heisen-ice-berg. Global media spreads a meme that implements a low-threshold fear activator in the hive mind. The observer influences the experiment, the amount of life energy invested can amplify these influences.

Internet, TV, radio and other forms of information transmission promote this global fear straight to the reptilian brain, plug it straight into the sub-consciousness. The dominators keep the meme alive by constant repetition, the fear based economy thrives.

Billions of people synchronise their fear with symbolic events like rock concerts or lights-out events and create a massive amount of energy around the vision of a hotter planet. The observer influences the experiment, SBS reports accelarating global warming.

What would happen if billions of people join their energy to abolish the systems of violence the dominators use? Would Bucky Fullers dream come true and every human being could participate in the abundance offered by our living planet?

I wonder whether I should laugh or cry when I see successful application of the secret on a larger scale for dubious reasons.

Blur-b

grounded, skyhooked.
totally underbooked.

moving in circles
growing in size
completing the cycles
letting light rise.

time stands still,
with a sweet flow
syncing at will
let your heart glow.

Let the rhythm take you in
let the fun of freedom begin
Nothing is as it seems,
dare to live your own dreams -
grounded, skyhooked.

Meaning can only be made after you have destroyed the search for meaning itself.

Tarot is a working model for the Multidimensional Self. Each card reflects a facet of who we are. A deck of cards is a neurological autobiography. The deck you design, in order to ring true, will have to communicate what is true to your own Central Nervous System and not just our socially, conditioned assumptions... The Fool that persists in his folly becomes wise.

All violence is the result of people tricking themselves [...] into believing that their pain derives from other people and that consequently those people deserve to be punished.

In the lives of early hominides, accidental death would like have been commonplace. Whatever the fatal maimings and disembowelments. however, and whatever the sense of no-moreness, a concept of death as inveitable, as mine, and as the lot of all living creatures would not have been thereby grasped. On the contrary, there might well have been a vague sense that "barring such a fate, I will go on 'forever'" In other words, only with experiences of natural death might the concept of death have taken root. Only through such experiences might it have been realized that a certain nullifying fate was inevitable and mine.

In the appearance of the-Other-in-death, a no-moreness of similarity is set against a persistence of similarity. It is of course an initial sense of likeness that awakens both - the still resonating and the dilute similarity of self to Other.

What do you turn on, when you turn on?

The basic rhythm of the galaxy is turn on, turn off... Free energy, structure, release/control, turn on/turn off, the oscillating rhythm of turn on/turn off... Expansion-contraction... Turn on... turn off... The body breathing to the old basic rhythm, turn on/turn off, open/close, in/out, contract/release, speed up/slow down, get free/get hooked
the cellular trip is through the body...

What do you turn on, when you turn on?

The proportions remain astronomical, the mammalian body, the human body, incomprehensively galactic, trillions of cells centering around structured organs, all interconnected, humming with market transactions, weather reports, pollution ratings, stellate arterials, watery canals jammed with plasma planets, humicological mysnerian clusters, white corpuscle comets, endorphan spaceships commuting, a whole monstrous galaxy breathing through terrestrial networks of living forms, all in communication, an 18-inch layer of slime covering a metal-rock planet, and every isolated organism around a 25,000 mile breathing diamater, in close connection with the one hold, the biological web...

What do you turn on, when you turn on?

Reincarnation center, densely packed genetic energy, and outwardbound from this compressed center, a web of molecules weaving the cellular fabric, exchanging, expanding, looking into the organic networks surrounding...

What do you turn on, when you turn on?

The cerebral headquarters ring by a sensory duline of a billion cell stations receiving and transmitting energies from within, and from without the somatic galaxy, the common sense organs: odor, taste, touch, balance, temperature, posture, movement, lightwaves, nightwaves, soundwaves, each sense organ operates on the same rhythm, on/off, open/up, close/down..,

What do you turn on, when you turn on?

Alternating current...while the body galaxy centers on a tightly compact DNA strand, every organ consolation within the body zodiac orbits around the brain, the brain- galactic headquarters of the nervous system, filling corporial space with flasing electric messages, out and back, off on, synaptic conversation, becoming amino acid architects snuggly protected in miniaturized general motor plant engineering cell chambers, design more and more complex fischer bodies.

What do you turn on, when you turn on?

This year's standard equipment, a 13 billion cell brain hooked up to stereophonic audition receivers, bifocal self-modulating auto tuning retinal video cameras, cell battery powered kinestetic magic eye shock adjusters, gustatory liquid analyzers, lingual pollution detectors, self-regulatory nasal gas traps for analysis and evaluation of very old chemical contentenergy moves, structure captures, around and around floating somatic constellations, cycling, circling...

What do you turn on, when you turn on?

The major structures have been identified for millenia by astro-biologists, philosopher priests, healers, observers of the fleshly heavens.

What do you turn on, when you turn on?

Each unit of energy in this cosmic dance, charged with attraction, repulsion forces pulling towards, escaping from, intensely contracted nuclear energy at galactic center explodes, scattering suns, hurdling out across one million light years, each stellar fragment, itself highly charged, spins through web fabric fields of radiant energy...

.. what is of moment is not movement per se but the fleshy reality of being entwined in being. If movement at times enthralls, it is the touch of flesh on flesh which carries enthralldom. Its dynamics are felt on the common ground of a shared tactility. Thus, my movements are not experienced as kinetic figures but as tactile patterns upon the other. Similarly, the other's movements ride a tactile strand of flesh coiled on flesh, that is, they arouse me not because of their kinetic quality per se, but because their intensities and rhythms are tactilely revealed to me.